🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," said a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this international debate evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.